Frankie C
10 months ago
Better than Imagine, and still has truly unlimited generations, and with the web version synced with the same account, it's even better, I hope face swap comes to the web version too tho, along with synced prompts
darkstarsphoto
1 year ago
Okay so after using the old version and this updated version I have to say I'm fairly disappointed. Multiple times with paid credits upscaling can either fail, or alter a certain asset in the image which results in not the original you wanted. Also this app had now become censored which was awesome about the original app actually having freedom to create anything but unfortunately now it's just pay to use, glitchy, lose credits, membership doesn't do much either.
Mroftra Artform
10 months ago
They say create with no restrictions, THERE ARE many restrictions, however, a decent result most times. once having trouble receiving credits (which I did recieve) now when I click to buy, just says "the order has been verified" so I can not buy again? (This problem still exists) Frustrating ap. Once again the tweaking of the app renders it unable to produce the end result. So sad,
David Rohdenburg
11 months ago
It's gets a little frustrating sometimes because the algorithm seems to get into a pattern of errors that you specifically ask it not to do, but even with that, it creates some really cool images when it gets it right.
Dan Piraino
10 months ago
Terrible. It was good in the beginning but just like their Mirror ai app they put restrictions on it to where you can't use certain words without a network error popping up. And they label it mature 17. What a joke. Don't buy a subscription they just change things and then you end up with something you didn't initially pay for.
Greg Thompson
10 months ago
The original version of this was awesome. Then they added NSFW filters that went way overboard. Now they have this pro version which fixes a few things but can't do NSFW at all, even though it's rated "Mature 17+" The overboard filters are gone but this app has become so boring it's pointless.
Matéo Gatounes
11 months ago
At first it was a great app, good and simple UI, totally usable without paying (but you have to watch ads often). But recently, the devs changed models to limit NSFW/sensitive content, I understand the reasons (even though I liked doing that sort of art), but the problem is that with those changes, the ai became uglier, dumber and incapable to do simple things like keeping a piece of clothing closed. Until the devs do something, I don't recommend the app at all, it's pretty much unusable.
Noble
10 months ago
They had 2 apps. And old one that was way more accurate and had overall better results. I saved up so many coins to just be able to make hundreds of free pictures without ads but then they upgraded to this version which is TERRIBLE. images come out a lot more disfigured, lower quality, and ths ads are way worse. Dont recommend at all anymore.
That One Guy
1 year ago
This was the best art application in its inception. With each update something great was taken away. Now it's to the point of being unusable, you are flagging prompts like analog and butterfly. Not to mention less mundane but more common prompts like medium bust or petite. Even your premade pictures have to have the wording changed before they can be realized because you have used prompts like large breasts.
Lumine Or Foxy
1 year ago
Long time love with this stuff. UNTIL support broke, image results break the EXACT FILTERS that you can put before creating it, AND RESULT IS WORSE THAN FORMER VERSION! Please tell me there's a better support system you have or I'm going to lower to 1 star and not share it with anyone. Even uninstalling and reporting it as not living to expectations. Only reason I'm keeping it at 2 stars, its much better with furry characters. However it's very noticeable how biased it is to human characters.
Riley Tiedemann
1 year ago
It was alright since this update, whatever happened. I know I use this app primarily for some odd things I'm sure you could imagine, but they became stricter on it, adding a setting called "blur sensitives". I turn the setting off because I don't want any blur but it still blurs "sensitives" anyway. Please fix this or just don't make it a setting because I'm really not liking this new update at all.
Eli Parker
1 year ago
The AI is actually worse than the original app. Even though "NSFW" is turned on, it still blocks you from seeing the image even if you didn't actually write anything NSFW. The face swap feature doesn't work anymore when you go to "realistic" settings like it used to on the old app. This app was supposed to be an improvement and it's worse in every way. And they removed the old app from the store so you can't go back and use it.
Shaun Chilcote (SuperSuki2014)
11 months ago
Was such a good app and maybe the best a.i. art app until the model changes, especially to my personal favorite, the "comic" style. At the very least when you completely update or overhaul a model/style, at least add options or variants to keep the old one such as Comic V1 while the new one is Comic V2, etc. Give people the option to get the older models back please.
Lez_Artist5iG
1 year ago
The updated version will blur images, no matter my settings. Certain words are restricted now. Chest of drawers, small lamp, and many others that leave no alternatives. When limiting words no matter their context, everyone fails to see the need for Pro. An in-app list of restricted words would help, as well as which artist works are supported. 3stars.
Stephen Gordon
10 months ago
I'll be blunt. You guys ruined the best experience for what the app Spellai represented back then at its peak with all the changes of the rules and restrictions to certain quality art like NSFW. You made it even worse by changing the style of the art to the point where the AI doesn't remotely match any specific descriptions within the prompt. It's no wonder why this app in its current state has lower ratings compared to the original.
charlie jones
10 months ago
I was hoping for a lil more, even if u type in detailed prompts the generator still takes the liberty to do whatever it wants, always ignoring most of the details u ask for. I understand the fact it won't put out adult material, I get that and it's a good thing, but it cannot decyper words with multiple meaning. Great app if u want random images, but if u are trying to create a specific image, this app is not the one.
Iverson Vandegrift
1 year ago
While similar to the original app, the original seems to be a bit more accurate in it's art, with less random limbs and weird morphs. The addition of a word restriction to either app also sucked, as it is poorly implemented and can be completely circumvented via a quick look at any thesaurus. Edit: lowered rating with discontinuation of the OG app. Easier to use other AIs anyways: customization is better and, for the most part, they're more accurate, and can be free to access everything. Bye.
Brandon Marks
1 year ago
It's very difficult to get your prompts to show what you want. Multiple bugs as well. Overall, it makes great art, but the process of seeing what you want is frustrating, and I paid for a year subscription which is pretty much worthless since they still want you using coins to do everything other than the initial prompt. Censors- you can't even type "smile" because "sm" is somehow bad. Lesson learned. Hopefully I find a better AI app that won't rip me off. I went from loving to hating this app.
Raymond Taylor
11 months ago
With their new version of the app, the image quality, the specified image inputs, and the filters have all been effected by the updates. For instance, type in glasses, it only recognizes it as an NSFW term. So instead, you have to be creative and type in "eyewear". Thats just one of several changes limiting the output quality and the user prompt alike. It's gotten bad.
Noelle purplecat
11 months ago
Depending on what you're asking for, it might give you what you want. After a few go throughs of generating, I can usually get a result I'm happy with. However, some prompts are straight up ignored. For example, I typed in that I wanted fully white eyes on a character, and even after a few generations and 17 tries with the inpaint tool, it still gave me yellow or pink eyes, which is very frustrating.