Stacey Graham
1 year ago
the free version is almost unusable because of the ads
André Hansson
1 year ago
Expensive and unstable. Also it's full of ads. I can't recommend.
Timmef
1 year ago
Have to wait til an ads done to start taking photos. Would be happy to pay to get rid of them but theres no option.
Mouladino Panhwar (Technical)
1 year ago
should be better and some other features like filters emoji and other specialy vivid filter.
Filzah Amirah Zahwa
1 year ago
the photo results are similar to the camera on the iPhone, good!!
ayur ajay soni
1 year ago
i opened for the first time i found too much ads within 5 seconds. also it is not working .in my phone
Jason Eleftheriou
1 year ago
subscription based app al lot of adds, and if you want to use the premium function you jave to pay monthly 5/6 buks.
Aaron Davis
1 year ago
I don't mind paying for software but a $5 WEEKLY subscription forever? Absolutely not.
nyan04
1 year ago
constant bombardment of ads (that they want to make you pay a WEEKLY SUBSCRIPTION to remove) and appears to just be based off open camera anyway. avoid at all costs
njh93
1 year ago
Cameras should not have ads, idc. And a one time payment MAYBE, but a subscription based service??? Lol kick rocks
Anthony Gabriel
1 year ago
Downloaded this to test it as it was recommended. My phone's camera gives better quality lol. It makes a 64mp cam look like 5mp.
John Love
1 year ago
Excellent camera app. Superior to Galaxy camera app. Ads are a bit horrifying. Would love to be able to pay one time for the premium app with no ads.
Stephen Wear
1 year ago
Too many annoying adds to make you miss a shot, I'll stick with open camera, it has the same features and no ads plus you get all the featurea for free
Alex Harness
1 year ago
I have never seen more ads in an app than this one. I don't support apps that intentionally make their free version downright worthless so you'll buy the paid version.
Pete Coleman
1 year ago
Full of adds. Only get some of the features unless you pay almost £5 a week. Not exactly fully featured, manual control nome existent as far as I could see. Uninstalled after few minutes of tinkering.
Jabber Cookie (Lyra)
1 year ago
This app was alright...until I opened it today and found that the TIMER had been locked behind a PAYWALL. It is now stuck on 10 seconds, I cannot turn it off. I shouldn't need to pay for a subscription to NOT use a timer in a camera app. If you want people to buy your app, make it good, don't try to trap your users
James Hulsmann
1 year ago
Only paid option is a subscription! It's over all no better or worse than the built in cam app, a bit more pixel like I guess. However, suffer ads you have to sit through before taking a picture, or $15.00 sub!!! Hard pass!!!
Jaden Desmond (Flaming Frostbite244)
1 year ago
they ads are a pain and the app layout comes across as incredibly dated. however the photos themselves are good and that's what matters. if they just offered a pay once premium version I'd give them money for that but I'm not paying $5 every single week to use this
Jones
1 year ago
Was talking with someone about how we'd heard Android photos can be improved by having a better app than the native camera one and saw this one recommended on reddit. Ha. Took only two photos with it before the ads became so overwhelming that I un-installed. Those two photos were of my cat and I honestly couldn't tell if they were any better than usual. Not worth the storage space to me, personally.
Dan Todd
1 year ago
Taking photos is about the moment. I saw a bald eagle flying by and went straight to GCam to take a photo of this beautiful moment. I needed to be quick to capture this moment in time. I waited 10 seconds for the in app ad to finish playing and hit the X button and then the app crashed. The bald eagle flew away and I missed the shot. This app is trash and I am so mad. What a waste of potential. Whoever thought to put ads in a camera app should be fired.